MrPorcine wrote:I would be surprised if the frame by itself had less air resistance then the complete boat. The boat is pretty aerodynamic but all those tubes and frames have terrible aerodynamics. The rule of thumb is if it doesn't have at least a 3:1 aspect ratio it's going to be very draggy.
As an example, a three inch long, one inch diameter pipe sticking out horizontally from the side of a small airplane has about the same parasitic drag as a complete wing. Hard to believe.
I agree with this. I am not an expert on aerodynamics, but it is logical that the frame alone will create a lot of turbulence as opposed to having the skin on. As Dickc said, it is known that roof racks cut down your mileage, and roof racks are just a bunch of tubes, kind of like a boat frame. That's why rack manufacturers sell fairings (well, that, and to make even more money off of us outdoor types) to let the air flow around the rack, not through it.
But all it really depends on is your speed. Drag force depends on the square of the velocity, so every time you double your speed, you quadruple your drag. At 25-30 miles an hour you wouldn't be wasting too much gas, but if you are doing 10 miles on the highway, you'll encounter lots of drag and lots of noise/whistling from the tubing.