I just finished painting the exterior of my Cayat (and even my mother-in-law says it looks good), and I'm getting ready to rebuild the interior. About the only thing that will remain stock is the daggerboard box and the seatbacks.
I was planning on going with an unstayed, wishbone boom mast with a roller-reefing sail for simplicity, but I've been reading the web again, and I've come across a number of pundits who criticize the unstayed design; principally because it isolates all of the sail force in the mast step, and therefore the mast & mast step must be built even heavier & stronger than if there were a couple of stays. While they are usually talking about real yachts, and not a Folbot "car yacht," they still have a point...
But I also have some unpleasant childhood memories of the lateen sail on our Cayat getting jammed up in the sidestays prior to swamping, and I'm therefore quite attracted to the concept of an unstayed mast. However, given what I've read online, the idea of distributing the sail force, instead of isolating it, is also attractive.
I've already decided to reinforce the mast step with trusses/ribs (the ribs will connect the daggerboard box, mast step & aka, so that the various forces cancel each other out), but I'm wondering if anyone on the folbot forum can speak to the practicality of a single, rear stayed mast. Given that with its planing hull the Cayat is designed for going fast downwind, that single stay might not be a bad idea...I'm envisioning a stay running from the aft point of the deck to the top of the mast. Since I'm going with a rigid mast/boom, I would need a simple, roller bearing mechanism at both the bottom and top in order to allow the mast to rotate freely. I've also seen some multi-hull designs with rear stays running from the aft of each ama, giving both lateral & longitudinal stability. But I still would not want the stays to impede the rotation of the mast/boom.
Input?


